Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Lucky you? Lucky me?

Today is a very exciting day for me. You see, after doing my morning ritual inside the bathroom, I watched Baywatch reruns for 12 straight hours. While oogling over both David Hasselhoff and Pamela Anderson, it suddenly hit me that people are categorically divided by trait measures, e.g. height- everyone has a height level but then some people are tall, some people are taller, and some people are really tall. Just like David Hasselhoff is extremely handsome, Pamela Anderson is handsome, and danger boy can't even have some (unless i pay). So then i thought " Nature has divided people categorically with inherent qualities, so what?!" But the more i thought about it the more it became obvious to me. The reason why i can't have some is because of the categorical divide made by man and nature. The divide that says I do not belong to the category where i am symmetrical enough to be handsome and decent enough to have some. This epiphany of thought left me very very upset so i decided to head into the bathroom to do the thing i do every time i am very upset. Then, the weirdest thing happened. Suddenly i had a light bulb moment 'ting' ---> i therefore conclude that people who are born handsome are lucky, people who are more handsome is luckier, and people who are the least handsome has no luck at all. Yeah! i made a wonderful discovery today. Isn't it exciting!!!
Now, to make it even more exciting i will test my theory. i am conducting a survey to see if there is a truth behind my theory. so please people, join my survey below.

Who do you think is the luckiest?